Go Back   Forums > Insurance Age > The Broker Forum
Register Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 18-06-2010, 17:32
Martin Friel's Avatar
Martin Friel Martin Friel is offline
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: The office
Posts: 123
Default What do regulatory changes mean for brokers?

Steve White, Biba's head of compliance and training gives some straightforward advice as to what George Osborne's plans for the FSA mean for regulation and general insurance brokers in particular.

It's really rather good - watch it here.
  #2  
Old 19-06-2010, 09:28
FullyComp FullyComp is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 29
Default

Thanks.

But I have to ask why more acronyms? Sure this will only confuse the consumer further. I agree with having different departments that can concentrate on different sectors of financial services but wouldn't it be better to simply have those departments under one umbrella?
  #3  
Old 21-06-2010, 09:18
Allan Gambles Allan Gambles is offline
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Huntingdon
Posts: 268
Default

Yes it is good. Martin being camera shy for a change?

Two questions.

1. Is it the CPM Agency or Authority?

2. Will it report to the BoE?

I read in one of the Sunday papers that there will be 3 main players - BoE, CPMA and another agency dealing with financial crime and there might be a risk of "falling between the cracks". The example given was that the CPMA might identify misconduct but the other agency mentioned might not think it worth prosecuting.
Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:22.